The EEOC requires that employers receiving a complaint, or otherwise learning of alleged harassment in the workplace, to “investigate promptly and thoroughly… take immediate and appropriate corrective action by doing whatever is necessary to end the harassment, make the victim whole by restoring lost employment benefits or opportunities, and prevent the misconduct from recurring”. That’s a tall order to ensure just and fair handling of a harassment complaint – an essential order that all organizations are required, by law, to follow. The investigation process is, perhaps, the most critical element in dealing with harassment. In cases that have gone to court, it is often due to inadequate or absent investigations of complaints. Do you know how to conduct an investigation? This program will cover the intricacies of conducting a harassment investigation.
WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND?
The investigation is essential in determining the validity of a complaint of protected class harassment and bullying. Conducting a fair and impartial investigation diminishes liability, and can decrease further misconduct by preventing it from becoming pervasive. The investigation may serve to minimize damages paid to the complainant. The institution demonstrates its commitment to the prevention and intervention of misconduct resulting in less harassment, discrimination, and other forms of misconduct on campus. By conducting its own investigation, the institution may avoid an investigation by another agency such as the EEOC. An investigation is required to help ensure a safe and healthy organizational climate.
Anyone who conducts an investigation must be trained in how to do so. Merely having the experience of conducting investigations without having been taught the art and science of the process is not enough. When your organization ensures it is investigator is trained in how to conduct investigations, it demonstrates its commitment to the prevention of harassment by the Court or outside agency.
The webinar addresses laws that HR is responsible for upholding. When the laws are not followed, it increases the liability of the organization and interferes with a fair and equitable work environment for employees.
AREA COVERED
- Determine if an investigation is necessary
- Discuss the steps of an investigation
- Explore the intricacies of interviewing the accuser, accused, and witnesses
- Differentiate between a formal and informal investigative procedure
- Determine the credibility of all interviewees
- Draw conclusions following an investigation
- List necessary elements in writing the formal report outlining the investigation.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
- Discussion about if and when an investigation is required
- Comparison of a formal and informal investigation process
- Planning for the investigation
- A review of what constitutes a witness
- Legal issues surrounding an investigation, such as confidentiality, defamation of character, and false imprisonment
- The importance of documentation of each interviewee
- Examples of appropriate and inappropriate documentation and why it is critical
- Specific details regarding how to corroborate evidence
- A list of criteria to determine the credibility of those interviewed
- He said/she said
- The role of the investigator in forming an opinion following the investigation
- How to follow up with the target, accused, and the organization?
- The critical importance of an investigative report
- List of misconduct triggers that are a catalyst for an investigation
- Template final report
WHO WILL BENEFIT?
- Human Resources professionals – those tasked with investigations such as generalists, managers, and directors
- Attorneys
- HR Consultants
The investigation is essential in determining the validity of a complaint of protected class harassment and bullying. Conducting a fair and impartial investigation diminishes liability, and can decrease further misconduct by preventing it from becoming pervasive. The investigation may serve to minimize damages paid to the complainant. The institution demonstrates its commitment to the prevention and intervention of misconduct resulting in less harassment, discrimination, and other forms of misconduct on campus. By conducting its own investigation, the institution may avoid an investigation by another agency such as the EEOC. An investigation is required to help ensure a safe and healthy organizational climate.
Anyone who conducts an investigation must be trained in how to do so. Merely having the experience of conducting investigations without having been taught the art and science of the process is not enough. When your organization ensures it is investigator is trained in how to conduct investigations, it demonstrates its commitment to the prevention of harassment by the Court or outside agency.
The webinar addresses laws that HR is responsible for upholding. When the laws are not followed, it increases the liability of the organization and interferes with a fair and equitable work environment for employees.
- Determine if an investigation is necessary
- Discuss the steps of an investigation
- Explore the intricacies of interviewing the accuser, accused, and witnesses
- Differentiate between a formal and informal investigative procedure
- Determine the credibility of all interviewees
- Draw conclusions following an investigation
- List necessary elements in writing the formal report outlining the investigation.
- Discussion about if and when an investigation is required
- Comparison of a formal and informal investigation process
- Planning for the investigation
- A review of what constitutes a witness
- Legal issues surrounding an investigation, such as confidentiality, defamation of character, and false imprisonment
- The importance of documentation of each interviewee
- Examples of appropriate and inappropriate documentation and why it is critical
- Specific details regarding how to corroborate evidence
- A list of criteria to determine the credibility of those interviewed
- He said/she said
- The role of the investigator in forming an opinion following the investigation
- How to follow up with the target, accused, and the organization?
- The critical importance of an investigative report
- List of misconduct triggers that are a catalyst for an investigation
- Template final report
- Human Resources professionals – those tasked with investigations such as generalists, managers, and directors
- Attorneys
- HR Consultants
Speaker Profile
Dr. Susan Strauss
Dr. Susan Strauss is a national and international speaker, trainer and consultant. Her specialty areas include management/leadership development, organization development, communication, and harassment and bullying. She is an expert witness for discrimination and harassment lawsuits. She trains and consults with business, education, healthcare, law, and government organizations from both the public and private sector. Dr. Strauss has authored over 30 book chapters, books, and articles in professional journals. She has been featured on 20/20, CBS Evening News, and other television and radio programs as well as interviewed for newspaper and journal articles. She has her doctorate in organizational leadership, is …
Upcoming Webinars
HIPAA Compliance in 2026 — Practical Strategies for Breach …
Launch Your Career: The Ultimate Guide for Emerging Profess…
Moving From an Operational Manager to a Strategic Leader
Discover how Emotional Intelligence turns AI from a technic…
Dealing With Difficult People: At Work & In Life
I-9 Audits: Strengthening Your Immigration Compliance Strat…
Empowering Conflict Resolution: Letting Go to Gain Control
The 60 Minutes Introduction to DAX
The 6 Most Common Problems in FDA Software Validation and V…
High-Impact Performance Management: Tools, Tactics & Coachi…
AI Across the Business: Practical Use Cases for Founders an…
Faster, Better Talent Acquisition: Leveraging AI & ChatGPT …
The Anti-Kickback Statute: Enforcement and Recent Updates
Do's and Don'ts of Giving Effective Feedback for Performanc…
Emotional Intelligence: Mastering the Emotions of Great Lea…
Copilot and HR: An Introduction for HR Professionals
Goal Mastery: From Resolutions to Results in 2026
Your AI Advantage: How HR Professionals Can Use Claude to S…
Human Error Reduction Techniques for Floor Supervisors
Validation of FDA-Regulated Medical Device and SaMD Product…
Human Factors Usability Studies Following ISO 62366 and FDA…
Managing Toxic & Other Employees Who Have Attitude Issues
I-9 Enforcement & Compliance: A 5-Step Plan for Employers t…
Major cGMP Issues: FDA Concerns in 2026
4-Hour Virtual Seminar on Transformational Leadership - The…
Understanding EBITDA – Definition, Formula & Calculation
DOL Reverses Course on Independent Contractor Rule for 2026…
Managing Toxic Employees: Strategies For Leaders To Effecti…
ChatGPT and Project Management: Leveraging AI for Project M…
Navigating HR Like A Pro: What Every Small Business & New H…
HPLC Analytical Method Development and Validation
Negotiating Skills For Professional Results - Winning Strat…
Managing Projects When AI Joins the Team: Human Judgment, A…
Excel Spreadsheets; Develop and Validate for 21 CFR Part 11…
Paying and Receiving Payments for Referrals: You Can Go to …
Ten Red Flags that Signal Financial Distress in Business Cu…
The Age-Inclusive Workplace: How to Lead and Work Across Ge…
Tattoos, hijabs, piercings, and pink hair: The challenges …
Fatal Errors Employers Make When Updating Employee Handbook…
AI Fundamentals for All Leaders and Managers: How to Work S…